Thomas Barrett v. Robert Pranger MD and Fiat Family Medicine, PLLC
|
|
|
Case Name: | Thomas Barrett v. Robert Pranger MD and Fiat Family Medicine, PLLC |
Case Number: | LACV142253 |
Date of Trial: | 05/30/2025 |  | Venue: | Black Hawk County |
 |
Casetype/Claims: | Personal Injury - Medical/Dental Malpractice |
|
Judge: | Andrea Dryer |
|
Plaintiff's Counsel: | Eashaan Vajpeyi, Max E. Kirk, and H. Daniel Holm, Jr. |  | Defendant's Counsel: | |
|  |
Verdict: | For defendant |
|
Demand Before Trial: | |
Offer Before Trial: | |
|
Statement of Case:
In this case, Plaintiff Thomas Barrett claims that Defendants Robert Pranger, M.D. and Fiat Family Medicine, PLLC were negligent in the treatment which they provided to Plaintiff and this negligence caused damages to Plaintiff. Plaintiff seeks compensation for damages that he claims were caused by Defendants’ negligence.
Defendants deny that they were negligent. Defendants deny that their actions were a cause of any damage to Plaintiff. Defendants further deny that the amount of damages sought should be provided to Plaintiff as compensation.
The parties stipulate and agree that for the purpose of deciding these issues, Defendants Robert Pranger, M.D. and Fiat Family Medicine, PLLC should be treated as a single party. |
|  |  |  |  |
Injuries alleged: | |
|
Official Jury Verdict Form: |
LACV142253 - Jury Verdict.pdf |
|  |  |  |  |
Documents of interest:
(when available) | LACV142253 - Jury Instructions.pdf |
|  |  |  |  |
Back to View
Return to Jury Verdict Home |
Access EDMS for more details on this case.
Disclaimer of Liability: The Iowa States Bar Association presents the information as a service to our members. While the information on this site is about legal issues, it is not legal advice. Moreover, due to the rapidly changing nature of the law and our reliance on information provided by outside sources, we make no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. |