Stoneking Enterprises, Inc. v. Amy Podzimek


Case Name:Stoneking Enterprises, Inc. v. Amy Podzimek
Case Number:LACV104987
Date of Trial:06/06/2025
Venue:
Linn County
Casetype/Claims:Contract – Debt Collection

Judge:Kevin McKeever

Plaintiff's Counsel:Samuel Gray and Robert HatalaDefendant's Counsel:James Moriarty

Verdict:For plaintiff:

$10,576.00

Demand Before Trial:
Offer Before Trial:

Statement of Case:
In this case, Plaintiff Stoneking Enterprises, Inc. claims that it and Defendant Amy Podzimek entered into an enforceable agreement and that Defendant breached the agreement by failing to make payments due under the agreement. The Defendant admits the parties entered into an enforceable agreement but claims that she is not obligated to pay Stoneking and has not breached the agreement. The issues in this case revolve around whether Stoneking Enterprises, Inc. is entitled to payment from Defendant Amy Podzimek and/or whether Defendant Amy Podzimek is excused from paying Stoneking.

Injuries alleged:

Official Jury Verdict Form:
Stoneking v. Podzimek Verdict Form.pdfStoneking v. Podzimek Verdict Form.pdf

Documents of interest:
(when available)		Stoneking v. Podzimek Jury Instructions.pdfStoneking v. Podzimek Jury Instructions.pdf

Back to View
Return to Jury Verdict Home


Access EDMS for more details on this case.

Disclaimer of Liability: The Iowa States Bar Association presents the information as a service to our members. While the information on this site is about legal issues, it is not legal advice. Moreover, due to the rapidly changing nature of the law and our reliance on information provided by outside sources, we make no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link.