(DJJ) William Schwering v Tiger Y Jung
|
|
|
| Case Name: | (DJJ) William Schwering v Tiger Y Jung |
| Case Number: | LACV030443 |
| Date of Trial: | 09/25/2026 |  | Venue: | Hamilton County |
|
| Casetype/Claims: | CIVIL LAW - CONTRACT/COMMERCIAL - OTHER |
|
| Judge: | Derek J. Johnson |
|
| Plaintiff's Counsel: | Chad Schneider | | Defendant's Counsel: | Jason Arthur Springer |
| |
| Verdict: | For Defendant
A. Plaintiff did not prove each of the elements of his claim for Failure to Disclose Pursuant to Iowa Code Chapter 558A against Defendant.
B. Plaintiff did not prove each of the elements of his claim for Breach of Express Warranty.
C. Plaintiff did not prove each of the elements of his claim for Breach of Implied Warranty for Workmanlike Construction.
D. Plaintiff did not prove each of his elements of his claim of Fraudulent Misrepresentation.
E. Plaintiff did not prove each of the elements of his claim for Unjust Enrichment.
TOTAL DAMAGES: ~$0 |
|
| Demand Before Trial: | |
| Offer Before Trial: | Plaintiff offered $47,137. Defendant did not counter. |
|
Statement of Case:
This is a civil case brought by Plaintiff, William Schwering, against Defendant, Tiger Y. Jung. This case arises from Schwering’s purchase of residential real property located at 807 Moor St., Stratford, Iowa from Jung. Schwering claims that (1) Jung had actual knowledge of, or failed to exercise ordinary care in disclosing, Material defects in the home that he was required to disclose under Iowa Code chapter 558A; (2) Jung breached the express and implied warranties regarding the repairs, renovations, and improvements made to the home; (3) Jung made fraudulent and/or negligent misrepresentations to Schwering about the condition of the home; (4) Jung’s conduct deprived Schwering of the quiet use and enjoyment of his home; and (5) Jung was unjustly enriched at Schwering's expense. Jung denies these claims and asserts several affirmative defenses, including that Schwering failed to mitigate his damages and that Schwering's own fault was approximate cause of any damages he suffered. Jung also filed a counterclaim against Schwering seeking attorney fees under the party's purchase agreement. If, based on the evidence presented, you determine that Schwering has proved all of the elements of a particular claim by the applicable standard of proof, then Jung is liable on that claim, and you must determine what amount of damages, if any, should be awarded to Schwering. If you determine that Schwering has failed to prove all of the elements of a particular claim, you your verdict must be for Jung on that claim. |
| | | | |
| Injuries alleged: | |
|
| Official Jury Verdict Form: |
 02401__LACV030443_CVVD_462218.pdf |
| | | | |
Documents of interest:
(when available) |  02401__LACV030443_INST_462207.pdf |
| | | | |
Back to View
Return to Jury Verdict Home |
Access EDMS for more details on this case.
Disclaimer of Liability: The Iowa States Bar Association presents the information as a service to our members. While the information on this site is about legal issues, it is not legal advice. Moreover, due to the rapidly changing nature of the law and our reliance on information provided by outside sources, we make no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. |